Mood:
lyricalNow Playing: Just plain old stupid is as stupid does.....
Topic: Without Regards
The letter below addressed to the Oregon State Bar was sent last week; but you guys just cannot honestly comprehend the uttter disregard I am saturated within. These unfortunate fools, are lost in attacking me for eternity as a tool to protect criminals....The US Atty. Asst. K. Robinson, FBI Spc. Agent in Charge Robert Jordan, and this Jared Garth, have decided to surpress my charges and investigate nothing--it is the most "bipolar plan" ever to exist. This is jus way over my pay level, I am lost out here in criminal land and the second I attempt to protect myself these idiots run to the gatekeeper themselves with a bribe or a threat--Where the hell are we---"It just cant be called America anymore, because we know better, we honestly know better." Contact anyone on my behalf NOW--Oh a quote from Jared Garth Letter--(it will not upload to my blog)
"I see some years back you filed a complaint against me with the Oregon State Bar Association." "Attorneys, will usually never accept a client whom has filed a Bar Complaint. The Attorneys, I know would never accept a client whom filed a Bar Complaint."
This is the response below.
Thursday, July 05, 2007
Oregon State Bar Complaint Form
Client Assistance Office,
Oregon State Bar
5200 SW Meadows Road
Lake Oswego, Or 97035
FACISIMILE 503 684 1366
Name and Address of Attorney
Jared Garth, Division Council
Portland Oregon FBI
1500 SW First Ave Suite 400
Portland OR 97201
503 224 4181
Dear Madam/Sir:
I am filing a complaint against Portland FBI Field Office Employee, Jared Garth, Division Council. This situation is criminal and Mr. Garth is the primary cause of the continued criminal actions. I, Belinda Jackson have endured; Mr. Garth, is an Attorney representing The FBI, he has also been designated as the individuals, whom handles my correspondence in relation to Federal Infraction that have occurred based on a USDOJ/OIG complaint I filed against the Portland FBI Field Office. Mr. Garth, has been no more than a Conspirator whom suppresses retaliatory criminal actions by The FBI Spec. Agents I filed my Compliant against. The complaint is with the United States Department of Justice/Office of Inspector General. The Spec. Agents including Spc. Gonzalez, Beauhiem, Grotty, Adams, Mueller, and Pritchard, and Supervisor Stephen Fiddler, Spc. Agent in Charge Robert Jordan/David Czdy (Tranferred in 2004/2002 from/ToDC) have failed to follow protocol set by their Employer and have openly allowed criminal actions to occur without investigation. These crimes include, Obstruction of Justice concerning my Complaint to USDOJ/OIG which has not been handled properly in relation to documented processing policy of the Department of Justice, Conspiracy, Internet Fraud, Illegal manipulation of my Wireless Service, Illegal Manipulation of my Bank Accounts, Mail Theft, Fraud, Illegal manipulation of my personal affairs, and what can only be termed cruel and unusual punishment (Drugging, Sexually Abusing and then taunting).
I communicated this information to William Treceder fomer General Council for the FBI and Mr. Jared Garth, Chief Division Council; both men have assisted in Obstructing Justice, and Retalitory effort, enclosed is a letter from Mr. Garth, which demonstrates his effort has been not even been minimal with regards to my criminal complaint; One of Which document correspondence from the Salem DA which his Office adamantly denies ever sending. He further states, I will not be able to retain an attorney and why then he act based on information he receives from the very individuals whom are being investigated by the US DOJ/OIG. The Investigation was allegedly sent to the San Francisco Field of the United States Department of Justice for investigation in 2005 as of 2007 I have not received any correspondence for USDOJ/OIG every attempt of mine to ascertain what has happened to my complaint is met with belligerent calculated misinformation and harassment. These individual are not abiding my their Agency own protocol and policy; if The Department of Justice was not investigating my allegation, I would have receive a letter stating so, instead I am just disconnected when I call. I asked for a hand written response and I am told it is not available without explanation just refusals. This is not China are some other third world nation which does not have to explain their decision with concern to a request, I sent a letter to Mr. Garth which simply stated, I, Belinda Jackson, believe my 1 Amendment and 14 Amendment rights are being violated and he send back a letter which only purpose was to intimidate, taunt, and provided evidence of criminal actions. Mr. Garth also violates Oregon State Bar codes listed below. I am in dire straits and the culprit works for the very agencies which are suppose to provide relief, it is a conspiracy to cover up ungodly criminal action which has gone on far to long. Mr. Garth is the point guy of the cover up and his conspiring with the very individual whom have Obstructed Justice and who are currently retaliating against me; I need relief and this Bar Complaint if handle correctly should provide the relief. I have evidence to support my charges and I have been offering the FBI and USDOJ/OIG by DNA to prove I, Belinda Jackson, have been drugged and Sexually abused as a weapon to cause and emotional break down as a way out of their blatant disregard of human rights.
Disciplinary Rule 3 Unlawful Practice of Law *
DR 3-101 Unlawful Practice of Law *
(A) A lawyer shall not aid a nonlawyer in the unlawful practice of law.
(B) A lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction where to do so would be in violation of regulations of the profession in that jurisdiction.
Disciplinary Rule 5 Conflicts of Interest
DR 5-101 Conflict of Interest: Lawyer's Self Interest *
(1) a lawyer shall not accept or continue employment if the exercise of the lawyer's professional judgment on behalf of the lawyer's client will be or reasonably may be affected by the lawyer's own financial business, property, or personal interests. As used in this rule, 'a lawyer's own financial, business, property, or personal interests' does not include serving in a pro tem capacity on any court, board or other administrative body where such service is occasional or for a limited period of time and compensation therefor is incidental to the lawyer's other sources of income;
(2) a lawyer related to another lawyer as parent, child, sibling, spouse or domestic partner shall not represent a client in a matter adverse to a person who the lawyer knows is represented by the other lawyer in the same matter.
(B) A lawyer shall not prepare an instrument giving the lawyer or a person related to the lawyer as parent, child, sibling, or spouse any substantial gift from a client, including a testamentary gift, except where the client is related to the donee.
DR 5-108 Avoiding Influence by Others than the Client *
(B) A lawyer shall not permit a person who recommends, employs or pays the lawyer to render legal services for another to direct or regulate the lawyer's professional judgment in rendering such legal services.
DR 5-109 Conflicts of Interest: Public Employment
(A) A lawyer shall not represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, arbitrator, or law clerk to such a person, unless all parties to the proceeding consent after full disclosure.
Disciplinary Rule 6 Competence and Diligence *
DR 6-101 Competence and Diligence *
(A) A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
(B) A lawyer shall not neglect a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer.
Disciplinary Rule 7 Zealously Representing Clients within the Bounds of the Law *
DR 7-105 Threatening Criminal Prosecution *
A) A lawyer shall not intentionally:
(1) Fail to seek the lawful objectives of the lawyer's client through reasonably available means permitted by law and these disciplinary rules except as provided by DR 7-101(B). A lawyer does not violate this Disciplinary Rule, however, by acceding to reasonable requests of opposing counsel which do not prejudice the rights of the lawyer's client, by being punctual in fulfilling all professional commitments, by avoiding offensive tactics, or by treating with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in the legal process.
(2) Fail to carry out a contract of employment entered into with a client for professional services but the lawyer may withdraw as permitted under DR 2-110, DR 5-102 and DR 5-105.
(3) Prejudice or damage the lawyer's client during the course of the professional relationship except as required under DR 7-102(B).
(B) In the lawyer's representation of a client, a lawyer may:
(1) Where permissible, exercise the lawyer's professional judgment to waive or fail to assert a right or position of the lawyer's client.
(2) Refuse to aid or participate in conduct that the lawyer believes to be unlawful even though there is some support for an argument that the conduct is legal.
Regards,
Belinda Jackson
PO Box 40804
Portland Oregon 97240
Cell 503 752 6040
http://mikejones3000.tripod.com
