Mood:
coolNow Playing: An Inability to grasp fact
This is amazing, I am actually able to give you guys a bit of information about Jackson v. US Bank. First, US Bank was fined 613 million dollar by the US Government for noncompliance of Federal money laundry laws. And two US Bank employees were in the process of being charge with felonies by NYC Attorney General this was February 2018-- So from this point I have to be very careful with my words-- I won my case against US Bank for unlawful termination. and was awarded 31k. Unbelievable you may think but the jury was not given instructions by the Judge about how to decided the judgement-- she mention other things but nothing about how the verdict must support the award of judgement or how to use multiplier for emotional abuse or a similar case to insure the Plaintiff was being treated fairly--and a host of other things-- this is being further researched by my Attorneys at Bennett Hartman-- They're researching if a presiding Judge can fail to provide Jury Instructions--
My heart went cold through out my trial; The Defendant's Attorney Janine Blatt ask Judge Skye if I had the Capacity to stand trail--((The Horror)) ((The prejudice)). If had the mental capacity to file a complaint and retain an Attorney-- how does my Capacity factor into a Civil Trial about Employment Law??? I also was made aware of a practice within Civil Trial when attorney meet with the judge and look at the law and language to determine if the statute is an actual reason for the Law Suit or is it a matter of law. The Jury has to determine a fact but the Presiding Judge can decide if it a matter of Law and denied my use of it ( I kind of thought the legislature had taken care of this). If it a matter of Law the Judge make a decision and the Jury doesn't even get to here about it... I am definitely looking for a publisher.
Dear Oregonian you're headline was not at all fair or even a service to the community it was bitter and false (Any Community). The term race retaliation was misconstrued within the language of my lawsuit with regards to race discrimination and my view Hangman was tantamount to lynching and I was offended and emotional demoralized based on my race. But as a matter of fact the language was so mangled by the Attorneys I don't believe the Jury had a clue about what they were actually supposed to do-- A session when the Attorney met with the presiding Judge and narrowed the language of the law to the point it was confusing. Yet, Oregonian (oregonlive) understand I don't blame you because the truth isn't your journalist purview. The Defendant's Attorney ask the judge to do a per-judgement(?) based on law and remove the Race Discrimination complaint of my lawsuit altogether but the Judge denied the motion.
Dear Public after my trial Judge Skye allowed some member of the Jury back into her Courtroom to ask the Attorney questions-- ((Appalled)) These Jury had just awarded me 31k and my original Lawsuit was 632k and although they found I was terminated unlawfully and US Bank had violated whist-blower laws lowered my economic damages-- Yes, my wages from 31k to 11k-- I had to sit through them saying my Attorney weren't polished-- and the Defendant's witnessed where coached-- Isn't coaching a witness illegal???? This is par during the Trial Judge Skye actually said I cannot wait to get back to a Murder trail; Right in front of me-- I guess she is more comfortable in criminal court.
